<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechCombo &#187; GPU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techcombo.com/tag/gpu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techcombo.com</link>
	<description>Technology, Health and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:16:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Graphics Cards</title>
		<link>http://techcombo.com/2009/08/03/the-future-of-graphics-cards-123/</link>
		<comments>http://techcombo.com/2009/08/03/the-future-of-graphics-cards-123/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cpt Longthumb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nVidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techcombo.com/?p=944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the next series of graphics cards just around the corner there is a lot of speculation on what specifications they have and how good they will be. In this article I aim to fill you in on the specifications of both sides and what is right from wrong. First to release their cards will be ATI and that is no surprise as nVidia have been shamelessly re-branding and failing to produce any ground breaking products i.e. the numerous failed attempts to put the GT200 core on a 40nm die. Where as ATI have already put a 40nm card out there in the shape of the RV740, even if there has been a huge shortage of 40nm wafers. There are a lot of reasons why ATI will be the first to the post, ATI have already, as I said above, got a 40nm card, they also have full DX10.1 which is only a stones throw away from DX11 and they also have a lot of experience with GDDR5. In comparison to nVidia, who hasn&#8217;t got any 40nm desktop cards or any with GDDR5 and a major ice breaker is the fact that their DX10 is a very stripped down version, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 2cm } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm } --></p>
<p><strong><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-960" src="http://techcombo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/ati-vs-nvidia-300x180.jpg" alt="ati-vs-nvidia" width="300" height="180" />With the next series of graphics cards just around the corner there is a lot of speculation on what specifications they have and how good they will be. In this article I aim to fill you in on the specifications of both sides and what is right from wrong.</strong></p>
<p>First to release their cards will be ATI and that is no surprise as nVidia have been shamelessly re-branding and failing to produce any ground breaking products i.e. the numerous failed attempts to put the GT200 core on a 40nm die. Where as ATI have already put a 40nm card out there in the shape of the RV740, even if there has been a huge shortage of 40nm wafers. There are a lot of reasons why ATI will be the first to the post, ATI have already, as I said above, got a 40nm card, they also have full DX10.1 which is only a stones throw away from DX11 and they also have a lot of experience with GDDR5.<in-context-comment:auto:0></p>
<p>In comparison to nVidia, who hasn&#8217;t got any 40nm desktop cards or any with GDDR5 and a major ice breaker is the fact that their DX10 is a very stripped down version, more like DX9.d. This brings a lot of issues for nVidia as their GT200 Die has been labeled a &#8220;monolith&#8221;. With more shaders comes more transistors and with more transistors comes bigger die area so the GT300 will be even bigger unless they can pull something magical out of a hat&#8230;or maybe defy the law of physics.<in-context-comment:auto:1></p>
<p>ATI are set to release in later this year, whereas nVidia are looking to be releasing in the middle of 2010, oh dear. Below I have made a table showing what the cards will most likely consist of. Enjoy.</p>
<div id="attachment_952" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 433px"><img class="size-full wp-image-952      " src="http://techcombo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/tablefinal.jpg" alt="Specifications Table" width="423" height="358" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Specifications Table</p></div>
<p>Now these figures are speculation but they are realistic figures compared to what I&#8217;ve seen some people claim on forums. One site which are so way off it&#8217;s unreal is <a href="http://www.wiyule.com/2009/01/20/ati-hd5870x4-details-leaked/" target="_blank">this one</a>. Claiming that a HD5870 will have 3200 SP + 80 TMUs comprising of 1 master chip + 4 slaves. Who comes up with this stuff, seriously. The big tell tale signs are, there is only 1 Xfire connector and the card is way to short (looks around 6 inches) But enough of the fan boy&#8217;s idiotic dreaming, onto the depths of the cards. Now given the table above is correct that is a lot of horsepower, no? But if we look at nVidia&#8217;s GT200 core, you&#8217;ll find that it only uses 4% &#8211; 10% of that core for GPU functions, the rest are be used for CPU functions, why nVidia did this I don&#8217;t know but it is a monumental waste of power, they seem to be hell bent on making the GPU take over the role of the CPU. But don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s over, oh no, the GT300 only uses ~8% of it&#8217;s core for GPU related tasks, there is no point in it, let the CPU do CPU tasks (apart from physics) it&#8217;s not like they can&#8217;t handle it specially if there are 8 cores on their way.<in-context-comment:auto:2></p>
<p>ATI on the other hand are slightly better as their RV770 uses ~20 of it&#8217;s core for GPU tasks, O.K granted it&#8217;s still not much but with ATI it&#8217;s understandable, the whole fusion project and all, which is a good idea in theory, putting a small low end GPU in the CPU to help speed communication between GPU and CPU is a lot better than making a all purpose GPU.<in-context-comment:auto:3></p>
<p>Now one thing I know most enthusiasts are wondering is Crossfire, or to be more specific, when will it scale after 2 cards. Well your answer is with the HD5 series, ATI have said they are spending a lot of time on drivers and making sure the cards scale well in 3 or even 4 card configurations, so not all bad news, that is until we come to nVidia. nVidia are changing their SLI and so far reports have said it&#8217;s not as good, but as this is very early nVidia have all the chance to get the 15% improvement they want, and I hope they get it.<in-context-comment:auto:4></p>
<p>The last thing I&#8217;m going to touch on in this article is the cooling of these soon to be beasts. Now with current cards struggling to keep the cores cool and be quiet your gonna have to lose one thing more than another, ATI seems to favour low fan speed over heat, where as nVidia prefer slightly higher fan speed and cooler core. But to combat this ATI have said they will be using a new cooling solution, now I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s a more advanced version of Sapphire&#8217;s Vapour-X stuff, but only time will tell. As for nVidia well my guess is they are just gonna throw more heatpipes and copper at it.<in-context-comment:auto:5></p>
<p>Well that was my first article, hope you liked it, please tell me if you did or didn&#8217;t below in the comments box. Till next time.<icc-first-publish><in-context-comment:auto-on></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techcombo.com/2009/08/03/the-future-of-graphics-cards-123/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

